Takoma Metro site zoning analysis
I wanted to better understand the zoning so I started looking into it and taking notes. From there it was a small step to the the write-up below, although I wouldn’t call the write-up complete. One goal is to understand how significant a variance WMATA and/or EYA will be seeking, via Planned Unit Development (PUD), from what’s allowed by-right by the zoning. The greater the variance, the more room for push back, if we have something we want to push back on. Another goal is to understand the review steps and timing, information I haven’t compiled (yet).
The Takoma Metro station is wholly in the District of Columbia. The location that would be developed is split between two different zoning designations, R-5-A and C-2-A. The R-5-A portion is adjacent to Eastern Ave NW. The C-2-A portion looks to be about 60% of the to-be-developed area, backing on the railroad tracks. I uploaded a map.
(Several years ago, Washington DC created a an TK/C-2-A Takoma Neighborhood Commercial Overlay District that includes the portions of the site directly on Cedar St, NW. Notably, “the Takoma Neighborhood Commercial Overlay District would… Reserve sufficient open space to provide adequate light and air to encourage retail and service uses, and pedestrian circulation in the vicinity of the Takoma Metro station”
Washington DC zones are explained online —
- R-5-A permits, “with the approval of the Board of Zoning Adjustment, new residential development of low density residential uses including row houses, flats, and apartments to a maximum lot occupancy of 40%… [and] a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.9, and a maximum height of three (3) stories/forty (40) feet… Rear yard requirements are twenty (20) feet, side yard requirements are not less than eight (8) feet.”
- C-2-A allows “housing to a maximum lot occupancy of 60% for residential use and 100% for all other uses, a maximum FAR of 2.5 for residential use… and a maximum height of fifty (50) feet. Rear yard requirements are fifteen (15) feet.”
The planned Takoma construction would not conform with these zoning limits. Here’s where the Planned Unit Development (PUD) comes into play.
A Planned Unit Development “allows a developer greater flexibility in site planning and building design. This flexibility permits the developer to incorporate amenities in the project that exceed those that could have been achieved under the general provisions of the Zoning Regulations. When a project is designated as a PUD, the ZC usually mandates the development of standards specifically tailored to the project.”
Further, the Takoma Metro site is in the (Washington DC) Takoma Park Historic District, which was listed as a local historic district subject to the D.C. Historic Landmark and Historic District Protection Act of 1978. The design would have to pass muster with the DC Historic Preservation Review Board. According to ANC Commissioner Sara Green, “The HPRB looks at a number of standards — primarily compatibility with the surrounding architecture. They do look at massing as well as the exterior design elements. The type of apartments and their size is not considered.”
3 Replies to “Takoma Metro site zoning analysis”
I assume that the PUD incorporated amenity will be the Metro parking and such.
I would like to see the 2002 plan's "Village Green" included, paying for putting the Metro elevator tunnel to Spring St. and a setback from Eastern as large as was in the 2002 plan.
Those seem like desirable amenities to me. I'd also opt for slightly greater density closer to the track and less density adjacent to Eastern, even though the zoning indicates the opposite.
Thanks for the comments. My interpretation is that the PUD will allow the developer to *mostly* ignore the zoning. The Metro parking and transit facilities will be a condition of the Joint Development Agreement and property sale, to be approved in the PUD if necessary but not sought through the PUD.